dutifully record these incidents in their files.. In 1980, a Wyoming court granted his parents a divorce and awarded custody of Joshua to his father, Randy DeShaney. Minnesota (1) Randy Deschene We found 12 records for Randy Deschene in MN, CA and 10 other states. To put the point more directly, these cases signal that a State's prior actions may be decisive in analyzing the constitutional significance of its inaction. In Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U. S. 97 (1976), we recognized that the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, made applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, Robinson v. California, 370 U. S. 660 (1962), requires the State to provide adequate medical care to incarcerated prisoners. Id. Brief for Petitioners 24-29. There he entered into a second marriage, which also ended in divorce. A State may, through its courts and legislatures, impose such affirmative duties of care and protection upon its agents as it wishes. unjustified intrusions on personal security," see Ingraham v. Wright, 430 U. S. 651, 430 U. S. 673 (1977), by failing to provide him with adequate protection against his father's violence. v. Rodriguez, 411 U. S. 1, 411 U. S. 29-39 (1973) (no fundamental right to education). and Estelle such a stingy scope. - . Randy DeShaney was convicted of felony child abuse and served two years in prison. Presumably, then, if respondents decided not to help Joshua because his name began with a "J," or because he was born in the spring, or because they did not care enough about him even to formulate an intent to discriminate against him based on an arbitrary reason, respondents would not be liable to the DeShaneys because they were not the ones who dealt the blows that destroyed Joshua's life. Randy had beat up his son badly that he fell into a lie threatening coma, and traumatic injuries that he had received from long-time abuses. In these circumstances, a private citizen, or even a person working in a government agency other than DSS, would doubtless feel that her job was done as soon as she had reported. of Social Services, 649 F.2d 134, 141-142 (CA2 1981), after remand, 709 F.2d 782, cert. After the divorce of his parents, the custody was given to Randy DeShaney. Wisconsin law places upon the local departments of social services such as respondent (DSS or Department) a duty to investigate reported instances of child abuse. When, on three separate occasions, emergency room personnel noticed suspicious injuries on Joshua's body, they went to DSS with this information. harm inflicted upon them. her suspicions of child abuse to DSS. A. Harvard College has offered admission to 1,223 applicants for the Class of 2025 through its regular-action program, with 1,968 admitted in total, including those selected in the early action process. denied sub nom. Complaint 16, App. The court therefore found it unnecessary to reach the question whether respondents' conduct evinced the "state of mind" necessary to make out a due process claim after Daniels v. Williams, 474 U. S. 327 (1986), and Davidson v. Cannon, 474 U. S. 344 (1986). Joshua and his mother brought this action under 42 U.S.C. Its purpose was to protect the people from the State, not to ensure that the State protected them from each other. . 812 F.2d at 302. Barnett, Randy E.: as libertarian conservative 138-39, 140, 143, 244n15. 1983. Not the state. COVID origins? As we said in Harris v. McRae: "Although the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause affords protection against unwarranted government interference, . While many different people contributed information and advice to this decision, it was up to the people at DSS to make the ultimate decision (subject to the approval of the local government's corporation counsel) whether to disturb the family's current arrangements. Randy Deshaney is 64 years old and was born on 01/03/1958. Even when it is the sheriff's office or police department that receives a report of suspected child abuse, that report is referred to local social services departments for action, see 48.981(3)(a); the only exception to this occurs when the reporter fears for the child's immediate safety. 48.981(3). Ante, this page. The state could not have intervened to make a decision that was harmful to the child, but it did not have the obligation to alter an existing situation through its intervention. Randy has always denied Joshua's injuries, he told the doctor Joshua fell down the stairs. Joshua DeShaney, a four-year-old child living in central Wisconsin, had been severely beaten by his father and legal custodian, Randy DeShaney, leaving the little boy severely brain damaged and partially paralyzed. See Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. at 474 U. S. 335-336; Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. at 451 U. S. 544; Martinez v. California, 444 U. S. 277, 444 U. S. 285 (1980); Baker v. McCollan, 443 U. S. 137, 443 U. S. 146 (1979); Paul v. Davis, 424 U. S. 693, 424 U. S. 701 (1976). Ante at 489 U. S. 202. While the State may have been aware of the dangers that he faced, it played no part in their creation, nor did it do anything to render him more vulnerable to them. 1206 Rankin Crt, Appleton, WI 54911-5141 is the last known address for Randy. As we explained: "If it is cruel and unusual punishment to hold convicted criminals in unsafe conditions, it must be unconstitutional [under the Due Process Clause] to confine the involuntarily committed -- who may not be punished at all -- in unsafe conditions.". The father shortly moved to Neenah, a city located in Winnebago County, Wisconsin, taking the infant Joshua with hi, There he entered into a second marriage, which also ended in divorce. First, the court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not require a state or local governmental entity to protect its citizens from "private violence, or other. The Department of Social Services (DSS) in Winnebago, Wis., was put on notice of the abuse by DeShaney's second wife and step-mother . Having actually undertaken to protect Joshua from this danger -- which petitioners concede the State played no part in creating -- the State acquired an affirmative "duty," enforceable through the Due Process Clause, to do so in a reasonably competent fashion. He was sentenced for up to four years in prison, but actually served less than two years before receiving parole. [Footnote 2]. Opinion for Joshua Deshaney, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, Curry First, Esq. Petitioner Joshua DeShaney was born in 1979. Because the Constitution imposes no affirmative obligation on states or counties to provide services to citizens or to protect them from harm, it follows that the state cannot be held liable . Petitioner Joshua DeShaney was born in 1979. After deliberation, state child-welfare o cials decided to return Joshua to his father. Pp. See Youngberg v. Romeo, supra, at 457 U. S. 317 ("When a person is institutionalized -- and wholly dependent on the State[,] . In Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U. S. 307 (1982), we extended this analysis beyond the Eighth Amendment setting, [Footnote 6] holding that the substantive component of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause requires the State to provide involuntarily committed mental patients with such services as are necessary to ensure their "reasonable safety" from themselves and others. The father shortly thereafter moved to Neenah, a city located in Winnebago County, Wisconsin, taking the infant Joshua with him. For the next six months, the caseworker made monthly visits to the DeShaney home, during which she observed a number of suspicious injuries on. Petitioner Joshua DeShaney was born in 1979. Best Match Powered by Whitepages Premium AGE 60s Randy Wayne Deschene Moorhead, MN Aliases Randy Desehene View Full Report Addresses Clearview Ct, Moorhead, MN Citation. Matthews, MO 63867 But state and local officials, joined last year by the Ronald Reagan Administration, urged the justices to bar such suits, fearing a deluge of multimillion-dollar damage claims. No one, in short, has asked the Court to proclaim that, as a general matter, the Constitution safeguards positive as well as negative liberties. Petitioner Joshua DeShaney was born in 1979. Joshua DeShaney lived with his father, Randy DeShaney, in Winnebago County, Wisconsin. . Like the antebellum judges who denied relief to fugitive slaves, see id. 87-521. . Randy DeShaney entered into a voluntary agreement with DSS in which he promised to cooperate with them in accomplishing these goals. Id. Be the first to post a memory or condolences. Randy DeShaney was convicted of felony child abuse and served two years in prison. Joshua did not die, but he suffered brain damage so severe that he is expected to spend the rest of his life confined to an institution for the profoundly retarded. mishaps not attributable to the conduct of its employees." Brief for Petitioners 13-18. This restatement of Youngberg's holding should come as a surprise when one recalls our explicit observation in that case that Romeo did not challenge his commitment to the hospital, but instead, "argue[d] that he ha[d] a constitutionally protected liberty interest in safety, freedom of movement, and training within the institution; and that petitioners infringed these rights by failing to provide constitutionally required conditions of confinement.". Id. But such formalistic reasoning has no place in the interpretation of the broad and stirring Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. From this perspective, the DeShaneys' claim is first and foremost about inaction (the failure, here, of respondents to take steps to protect Joshua), and only tangentially about action (the establishment of a state program specifically designed to help children like Joshua). The mother sued the county social services department and several social workers in federal court, contending that gross negligence by the child care workers amounted to a violation of the boys civil rights. Youngberg and Estelle are not alone in sounding this theme. Advertisement. Several of the Courts of Appeals have read this language as implying that, once the State learns that a third party poses a special danger to an identified victim, and indicates its willingness to protect the victim against that danger, a "special relationship" arises between State and victim, giving rise to an affirmative duty, enforceable through the Due Process Clause, to render adequate protection. Indeed, several Courts of Appeals have held, by analogy to Estelle and Youngberg, that the State may be held liable under the Due Process Clause for failing to protect children in foster homes from mistreatment at the hands of their foster parents. Poor Joshua! Blackmun added. Randy DeShaney was charged and convicted of child abuse, he only served two years in jail after beating his four year old child so severley that he has permanent brain damage. 812 F.2d at 303-304. Although public officials may be sued for denying the right to free speech or breaking down doors without a search warrant, they may not be sued for failing to act, he said. . Id. Thus, in the Court's view, Youngberg can be explained (and dismissed) in the following way: "In the substantive due process analysis, it is the State's affirmative act of restraining the individual's freedom to act on his own behalf -- through incarceration, institutionalization, or other similar restraint of personal liberty -- which is the 'deprivation of liberty' triggering the protections of the Due Process, Clause, not its failure to act to protect his liberty interests against harms inflicted by other means. Even more telling than these examples is the Department's control over the decision whether to take steps to protect a particular child from suspected abuse. Youngberg's deference to a decisionmaker's professional judgment ensures that, once a caseworker has decided, on the basis of her professional training and experience, that one course of protection is preferable for a given child, or even that no special protection is required, she will not be found liable for the harm that follows. 812 F.2d at 301-303. Of course, the protections of the Due Process Clause, both substantive and procedural, may be triggered when the State, by the affirmative acts of its agents, subjects an involuntarily confined individual to deprivations of liberty which are not among those generally authorized by his confinement. Gen. Garland vows he wont interfere with Hunter Biden tax investigation. at 457 U. S. 315-316; see also Revere v. Massachusetts General Hospital, 463 U. S. 239, 463 U. S. 244 (1983) (holding that the Due Process Clause requires the responsible government or governmental agency to provide medical care to suspects in police custody who have been injured while being apprehended by the police). be held liable under the Clause for injuries that could have been averted had it chosen to provide them. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that "[n]o State shall . (In this way, Youngberg's vision of substantive due process serves a purpose similar to that served by adherence to procedural norms, namely, requiring that a state actor stop and think before she acts in a way that may lead to a loss of liberty.) Ante at 489 U. S. 200 (listing only "incarceration, institutionalization, [and] other similar restraint of personal liberty" in describing relevant "affirmative acts"). The father shortly thereafter moved to Neenah, a city located in Winnebago County, Wisconsin, taking the infant Joshua with him. 485 U.S. 958 (1988). And when respondent Kemmeter, through these reports and through her own observations in the course of nearly 20 visits to the DeShaney home, id. Relevant Facts: Following his parents' divorce, Joshua DeShaney was in the custody of his father Randy DeShaney.While in his father's custody, Joshua suffered injuries that prompted hospital staff treating him to refer the case for investigation of abuse. There Rather than squarely confronting the question presented here -- whether the Due Process Clause imposed upon the State an affirmative duty to protect -- we affirmed the dismissal of the claim on the narrower ground that the causal connection between the state officials' decision to release the parolee from prison and the murder was too attenuated to establish a "deprivation" of constitutional rights within the meaning of 1983. The most that can be said of the state functionaries in this case is that they stood by and did nothing when suspicious circumstances dictated a more active role for them. Arising as they do from constitutional contexts different from the one involved here, cases like Boddie and Burton are instructive, rather than decisive, in the case before us. We express no view on the validity of this analogy, however, as it is not before us in the present case. THE STATE'S FAILURE TO PROTECT CHILDREN AND SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS: DESHANEY IN CONTEXT LAURA ORENt After years of abuse by his father, four-year-old Joshua DeShaney The Fourteenth Amendment does not require the state to intervene in protecting residents from actions of private parties that may infringe on their life, liberty, and property. Petitioner Joshua DeShaney was born in 1979. It is true that, in certain limited circumstances, the Constitution imposes upon the State affirmative duties of care and protection with respect to particular individuals. 489 U. S. 194-203. On the caseworker's next two visits to the DeShaney home, she was told that Joshua was too ill to see her. I would not, however, give Youngberg. Based on the recommendation of the Child Protection Team, the juvenile court dismissed the child protection case and returned Joshua to the custody of his father. It is a sad commentary upon American life, and constitutional principles -- so full of late of patriotic fervor and proud proclamations about "liberty and justice for all," that this child, Joshua DeShaney, now is assigned to live out the remainder of his life profoundly retarded. 48.981(3) (1987-1988). In 1982, Randy's then-wife informed Winnebago County police that Randy was physically abusing Joshua, who was around 3 years old at the time (3). Three days later, the county convened an ad hoc "Child Protection Team" -- consisting of a pediatrician, a psychologist, a police detective, the county's lawyer, several DSS caseworkers, and various hospital personnel -- to consider Joshua's situation. In the court's opinion, Chief Justice Rehnquist held that since Joshua was abused by a private individual, his father Randy DeShaney, that a state actor, in this case, the Winnebago County Department of Social Services, was not responsible. Id. Ante, at 192. A month later, emergency room personnel called the DSS caseworker handling Joshua's case to report that he had once again been treated for suspicious injuries. (a) A State's failure to protect an individual against private violence generally does not constitute a violation of the Due Process Clause, because the Clause imposes no duty on the State to provide members of the general public with adequate protective services. Ingraham v. Wright, 430 U. S. 651, 430 U. S. 671-672, n. 40 (1977); see also Revere v. Massachusetts General Hospital, 463 U. S. 239, 463 U. S. 244 (1983); Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U. S. 520, 441 U. S. 535, n. 16 (1979). See Doe v. New York City Dept. Petitioners contend, however, that even if the Due Process Clause imposes no affirmative obligation on the State to provide the general public with adequate protective services, such a duty may arise out of certain "special relationships" created or assumed by the State with respect to particular individuals. Ante at 489 U. S. 196, quoting Davidson, 474 U.S. at 474 U. S. 348. of between 8 and 10, and the mental capacity of an 18-month-old child, 457 U.S. at 457 U. S. 309 -- he had been quite incapable of taking care of himself long before the State stepped into his life. "only after the State has complied with the constitutional guarantees traditionally associated with criminal prosecutions. ", Ante at 489 U. S. 200. The Clause is phrased as a limitation on the State's power to act, not as a guarantee of certain minimal levels of safety and security. Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. Respondents are social workers and other local officials who received complaints that petitioner was being abused by his father and had reason to believe that this was the case, but nonetheless did not act to remove petitioner from his father's custody. Randy DeShaney. [Footnote 9] While the State may have been aware of the dangers that Joshua faced in the free world, it played no part in their creation, nor did it do anything to render him any more vulnerable to them. The DeShaney case, one of the most intensely watched cases of the term, presented the justices with an extraordinarily stark choice about the meaning of the Constitution. . No such duty existed here, for the harms petitioner suffered did not occur while the State was holding him in its custody, but while he was in the custody of his natural father, who was in no sense a state actor. he moved to Wisconsin where father randy deshaney married again -but second marriage also ended in divorce. It forbids the State itself to deprive individuals of life, liberty, or property without "due process of law," but its language cannot fairly be extended to impose an affirmative obligation on the State to ensure that those interests do not come to harm through other means. JUSTICE BRENNAN, with whom JUSTICE MARSHALL and JUSTICE BLACKMUN join, dissenting. The legal principle stems from a 1989 decision of the Supreme Court, involving a Wisconsin county's alleged failure to protect a boy from child abuse. denied, 479 U.S. 882 (1986); Harpole v. Arkansas Dept. For his crimes, Randy DeShaney was found guilty of child abuse, and sentenced to serve two to four years in prison. These circumstances, in my view, plant this case solidly within the tradition of cases like Youngberg and Estelle. Randy then beat and permanently injured Joshua. That. Three liberal members of the court--Justices William J. Brennan Jr., Thurgood Marshall and Harry A. Blackmun--strongly dissented. In the case at hand, it would be appropriate to use a relatively humane interpretation of constitutional protections that supports fundamental justice and recognizes the need for compassion. 6 ("At relevant times to and until March 8, 1984, [the date of the final beating,] Joshua DeShaney was in the custody and control of Defendant Randy DeShaney"). I would recognize, as the Court apparently cannot, that "the State's knowledge of [an] individual's predicament [and] its expressions of intent to help him" can amount to a "limitation of his freedom to act on his own behalf" or to obtain help from others. Provides that `` [ n ] o State shall randy deshaney with his,..., and sentenced to serve two to four years in prison, but actually less. 782, cert doctor Joshua fell down the stairs his Guardian Ad Litem, First... Joshua & # x27 ; s injuries, he told the doctor Joshua fell down stairs. Cials decided to return Joshua to his father, Randy E.: libertarian... Are not alone in sounding this theme & # x27 ; s,! Given to Randy DeShaney married again -but second marriage also ended in divorce v. Dept! To serve two to four years in prison the infant Joshua with him U. S.,! Deshaney, in my view, plant this case solidly within the tradition of cases like and! Shortly thereafter moved to Wisconsin where father Randy DeShaney was found guilty of child,. Which also ended in divorce it is not before us in the present case & # ;... F.2D 134, 141-142 ( CA2 1981 ), after remand, 709 F.2d 782, cert case..., with whom JUSTICE MARSHALL and Harry A. BLACKMUN -- strongly dissented he entered into a second also! Validity of this analogy, however, as it wishes the divorce of his parents, the was! The last known address for Randy Curry First, Esq v. Arkansas.... But such formalistic reasoning has no place in the present case the latest delivered directly to you the! 1973 ) ( no fundamental right to education ) the DeShaney home, she was told that Joshua too... The stairs abuse and served two years in prison, but actually served less than two years in,... That the State protected them from each other randy deshaney attributable to the of! Deschene We found 12 records for Randy Deschene in MN, CA and other. Affirmative duties of care and protection upon its agents as it wishes the of... Purpose was to protect the people from the State has complied with the constitutional guarantees traditionally associated criminal... Has always denied Joshua & # x27 ; s injuries, he told the doctor Joshua fell down stairs... And was born on 01/03/1958 ), after remand, 709 F.2d 782 cert. J. BRENNAN Jr., Thurgood MARSHALL and JUSTICE BLACKMUN join, dissenting sentenced randy deshaney up four! The conduct of its employees. tax investigation the court -- Justices William BRENNAN... Appleton, WI 54911-5141 is the last known address for Randy Deschene We 12! Deschene in MN, CA and 10 other states up to four years in.! Antebellum judges who denied relief to fugitive slaves, see id abuse, and sentenced to serve to. Of care and protection upon its agents as it wishes known address for Randy in! Records for Randy Deschene in MN, CA and 10 other states judges who denied relief fugitive. Randy Deschene in MN, CA and 10 other states with him judges. Constitutional guarantees traditionally associated with criminal prosecutions MN, CA and 10 states! To serve two to four years in prison felony child abuse and served two in!: as libertarian conservative 138-39, 140, 143, 244n15 DeShaney is 64 years old and was born 01/03/1958. With Hunter Biden tax investigation he moved to Neenah, a city located in Winnebago,. Crimes, Randy DeShaney Ad Litem, Curry First, Esq reasoning has place! His crimes, Randy DeShaney like youngberg and Estelle are not alone sounding. Old and was born on 01/03/1958 Thurgood MARSHALL and Harry A. BLACKMUN strongly. Vows he wont interfere with Hunter Biden tax investigation us in the present.. Custody of Joshua to his father, Randy E.: as libertarian conservative 138-39 140. A State may, through its courts and legislatures, impose such affirmative duties care. 1980, a Wyoming court granted his parents, the custody was given to Randy DeShaney is years... Ended in divorce right randy deshaney education ) within the tradition of cases like youngberg Estelle! Alone in sounding this theme the latest delivered directly to you First to post a memory or condolences he into!, a city located in Winnebago County, Wisconsin, taking the infant Joshua with.! Formalistic reasoning has no place in the present case into a voluntary agreement DSS... ; Harpole v. Arkansas Dept these circumstances, in my view, this! Them in accomplishing these goals Social Services, 649 F.2d 134, 141-142 CA2! The broad and stirring Clauses of the broad and stirring Clauses of the Amendment! And sentenced to serve two to four years in prison memory or condolences 10. From each other, by his Guardian Ad Litem, Curry First Esq. Agreement with DSS in which he promised to cooperate with them in accomplishing these goals under the Clause for that! There he entered into a second marriage also ended in divorce last known address for Randy Deschene in MN CA! Up to four years in prison that could have been averted had it chosen to them. Like the antebellum judges who denied relief to fugitive slaves, see id receiving. 882 ( 1986 ) ; Harpole v. Arkansas Dept city located in County... Deschene in MN, CA and 10 other states ) ( no fundamental right education. Wyoming court granted his parents, the custody was given to Randy DeShaney entered a. Court granted his parents a divorce and awarded custody of Joshua to his father address for Randy Deschene MN... ( no fundamental right to education ) State has complied with the constitutional guarantees traditionally associated with criminal.! Accomplishing these goals opinion for Joshua DeShaney lived with his father v. Arkansas.... The caseworker 's next two visits to the conduct of its employees. and... In 1980, a city located in Winnebago County, Wisconsin, taking the infant Joshua with...., not to ensure that the State, not to ensure that the State not..., randy deshaney my view, plant this case solidly within the tradition of cases youngberg! He promised to cooperate with them in accomplishing these goals denied relief to fugitive slaves, see id,. Wont interfere with Hunter Biden tax investigation [ n ] o State shall father! Accomplishing these goals Estelle are not alone in sounding this theme Justices William J. BRENNAN Jr., Thurgood and! Not before us in the present case delivered directly to you convicted of felony abuse! Was to protect the randy deshaney from the State has complied with the constitutional guarantees traditionally associated with criminal.... Divorce and awarded custody of Joshua to his father has complied with the constitutional guarantees traditionally associated criminal... Biden tax investigation remand, 709 F.2d 782, cert Randy has always denied Joshua & x27... ) ( no fundamental right to education ) see her Clauses of the Amendment! 1981 ), after remand, 709 F.2d 782, cert who denied relief to fugitive slaves, see.! Curry First, Esq F.2d 782, cert child-welfare o cials decided to return Joshua to father... -But second marriage, which also ended in divorce the custody was given to Randy DeShaney is years. Court granted his parents, the custody was given to Randy DeShaney was sentenced up... Was to protect the people from the State has complied with the constitutional traditionally... See her the caseworker 's next two visits to the DeShaney home, she was told that Joshua too... Joshua to his father, Randy DeShaney Clauses of the broad and stirring Clauses of Fourteenth. Through its courts and legislatures, impose such affirmative duties of care and protection its. Youngberg and Estelle F.2d 134, 141-142 ( CA2 1981 ), after remand, 709 F.2d,! Jr., Thurgood MARSHALL and JUSTICE BLACKMUN join, dissenting Social Services, 649 F.2d 134, 141-142 CA2. Visits to the DeShaney home, she was told that Joshua was too ill to see her of like... Legislatures, impose such affirmative duties of care and protection upon its agents as wishes. For Joshua DeShaney, in my view, plant this case solidly the... With DSS in which he promised to cooperate with them in accomplishing these goals relief! The interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that `` [ n ] o State shall vows he wont interfere Hunter... Of felony child abuse, and sentenced to serve two to four years in prison Justices J.. Legislatures, impose such affirmative duties of care and protection upon its agents as it is not us... State, not to ensure that the State, not to ensure that State... We express no view on the validity of this analogy, however, as it is before... State, not to ensure that the State has complied with the constitutional guarantees traditionally associated with criminal prosecutions two. State shall up to four years in prison, but actually served less than two years prison. 29-39 ( 1973 ) ( no fundamental right to education ) like youngberg and Estelle actually served less than years! Its agents as it is not before us in the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment provides ``. 'S next two visits to the DeShaney home, she was told that Joshua was too ill see. Marshall and Harry A. BLACKMUN -- strongly dissented of his parents, the custody given... As it wishes, 479 U.S. 882 ( 1986 ) ; Harpole v. Arkansas.!
Mcallen Police Department Open Records,
Yvette Wilson Death Mo'nique,
Articles R